skip top navigation
skip to content

Fact Sheet: Formative Assessment

The purpose of formative assessment tasks and
activities is to provide the teacher with a window into
students’ cognitive processes. Formative assessments
allow students to show their thinking and allow teachers
a way to see and gauge students’ cognitive processes.

What Is Formative Assessment?

The use of assessment to provide feedback to teachers
and students in the course of learning is called formative
. Information gained through informal assessments
provides opportunities for teachers to make adjustments to the
ways in which they deliver instruction. For example, they may
reteach a concept, use alternative instructional approaches, or
offer more opportunities for practice and reinforcement. These
activities can lead to improved student success.

Formative assessment centers on active feedback loops that assist learning (Black & Wiliam, 2004; Sadler, 1989; Shavelson, 2006). Teachers use formative assessments both to provide feedback to students about their progress and to guide decisions about next steps in the learning process, thereby closing the gap between the learner’s current and desired states. Popham (2008) defines formative assessment as “a planned process in which teachers or students use assessment-based evidence to adjust what they are currently doing” (p. 15). The operative word in this definition is process, in that formative assessment is happening throughout the learning, as opposed to summative assessment, which is often a one-time event that occurs at the end of a learning unit and is used to make judgments about student competence.

Elements of the Formative Assessment Process

Several researchers (e.g., Black & Wiliam, 1998, Sadler, 1989)
have identified essential elements of formative assessment.
These include (1) identifying the gap, (2) feedback, (3) learning
progressions, and (4) student involvement, which are described
as follows.

  1. Identifying the gap is the process of defining the difference (the “gap”) between what students know and what they need to know; it includes collaboration between teacher and learner to identify learning goals and outcomes and criteria for achieving these.
  2. Feedback (i.e., rich conversations between the teacher and student) gives the teacher information needed to identify the current status of a student’s learning as well as the specific next steps that he or she can take to improve. Teacher feedback to students must be both constructive and timely to enable students to advance their learning. It must include a description of how their response differed from that reflected in the desired learning goal and how they can move forward. Student feedback and reflection can alert the teacher of the need to modify instructional approaches.
  3. Learning progressions are used by the teacher to break a learning goal into smaller, more manageable subgoals. The teacher identifies a student’s location on the learning continuum and works collaboratively with the student to set a series of smaller goals.
  4. Involving students in decisions about their own learning and in self-assessment helps students to engage in reflection and build their metacognitive skills. See the TEAL Center Fact Sheet No. 4 on Metacognitive Processes. There is a profound influence on student motivation and self-esteem when students are involved in self-assessments and understand how to improve.

“Formative assessment represents evidence-based instructional decision making. If you want to become more instructionally effective, and if you want your students to achieve more, then formative assessment should be for you.”

– Popham (2008), p. 15

Why Use Formative Assessment?

Formative assessment with appropriate feedback is the most
powerful moderator in the enhancement of achievement
(Hattie & Timperley, 2007). Formative assessment helps
teachers identify the current state of learners’ knowledge and
skills; make changes in instruction so that students meet
with success; create appropriate lessons, activities, and
groupings; and inform students about their progress to help
them set goals (Ainsworth & Viegut, 2006, p. 23).

Teachers can use results of formative assessments to adjust
their teaching strategies and match students with appropriate
materials and learning conditions. Information gained from
formative assessment can help a teacher determine (1) how
to group students, (2) whether students need alternative
materials, (3) how much time to allocate to specific learning
activities, (4) which concepts need to be re-taught to specific
students, and (5) which students are ready to advance.

Feedback on Student Writing

The role of feedback in the learner’s writing quality has received
considerably less attention than it deserves, according to the
few researchers who have turned the inquiry spotlight from
students’ compositions to teachers’ comments on drafts.
Teacher feedback, given in written annotations and in oral
comments in conferencing, is the mechanism to provide the
guided practice struggling writers need to apply newly learned
skills (Pathey-Chavez, Matsumura, & Valdes, 2004).

Too often, students tend to correct only those specific
errors or directions that are noted without taking the steps
to revise the draft (Beach & Friedrich, 2006; Fisher & Frey,
2007), resulting in no real improvement in the consequent
draft. These researchers recommend providing feedback
through modeling of metacognitive processing and carefully
focusing feedback in written and oral comments on students’
understanding of writing development. They emphasize that
conferences about writing drafts should end with a written
plan of action, whether or not these have occurred face-to-face
or online.

A national study of effective writing conducted in the U.K.
(Grief, Meyer, & Burgess, 2007) credits constructive and
timely feedback with significant development of competence
and confidence. The study’s authors recommend that group
dialogue and individual feedback be part of a writing curriculum
for adult basic education students.

Recommended Strategies

The purpose of assessment tasks and activities is to
provide the teacher with a window into students’ cognitive
processes. Formative assessments allow students to show
their thinking and allow teachers a way to see and gauge
students’ cognitive processes.

Forms of assessment can range from performance-based
assessments to reflection journals to multiple-choice items.
They can take the form of checklists, rubrics, written papers or
oral presentations, graphic organizers, Socratic questioning,
etc. They can be teacher observations of student performance,
teacher questioning/class discussions, analysis of student
work, student self-assessment, KWLs, and student journals,
among other informal assessments. The following approaches
are useful for assessing students’ knowledge about a given
topic as well as their writing skills:

  • Quick Write: As a pre- or post-assessment tool, 1- to
    3-minute quick writes on a topic or big idea can be
    revealing. Student responses often show what they do
    or do not understand about a topic, and they provide the
    teacher with insights into the reasoning processes that
    students are using.
  • Graphic Organizers: These include items such as Venn
    , word/idea webs or concept maps, cause/effect charts, flowcharts, and sequence charts. Graphic
    organizers can be used to assess prior knowledge,
    record learning during a lecture or class reading, or
    organize knowledge after learning.
  • Cloze Writing: The cloze procedure consists of fill-in-the-blank activities for sentences
    and paragraphs that can be used to assess knowledge.
    Facilitative supports, such as a vocabulary bank, can be
    used for sentences. For a more extended response,
    students can be given a short story (for example) for
    which they must write a one-paragraph ending. The
    brainstorming for this activity can be done in pairs or
    small groups, and then each student can write his or her
    own one-paragraph ending.
  • Think-Pair-Share or Write-Pair-Share: These types of
    activities ensure that everyone has a chance to talk and
    process their thinking. Ask for two minutes of silence
    while each student considers his or her response to a
    prompt, text, lecture, etc. Then, have students take turns
    sharing their reflections with a partner. Some reflections
    can then be shared with the whole group.
  • Entry/Exit Cards: As students enter class, they respond
    to a prompt displayed on the board or a flipchart (e.g., a
    sentence or short paragraph) related to the topic of that
    day’s lesson. Alternatively, students can be asked for an
    exit card” that provides insight into what they learned
    from the day’s activities or what they predict might follow.
  • Student Reflection: The teacher can encourage students
    to reflect on their accomplishments as well as their
    challenges by asking students to answer questions that
    spark critical thinking:
    • What was your task, the ultimate goal, or the outcome
      for this activity?
    • What are some important concepts and ideas that you
      discovered/learned? Why are they important?
    • How did you solve the problem or task? Did you reach
      your goal? Explain.
    • Would you make changes if you had to do it again?

There is a significant body of evidence linking the formative
with student achievement. Adult educators, by
encouraging student reflection on their learning and by involving
students in decisions related to next steps in reaching their
learning goals, both motivate and empower students in the
assessment and learning process. Formative assessment
can help teachers improve the quality of instruction and help
students reach their full potential.


Ainsworth, L., & Viegut, D. (2006). Common formative assessments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Beach, R., & Friedrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222–234). New York: Guilford Press.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2007). Checking for understanding: Formative assessment techniques for your classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Grief, S., Meyer, B., & Burgess, A. (2007). Effective teaching and learning: Writing. London: NRDC. Retrieved December 27, 2011, from

Hattie, J., & Temperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Pathey-Chavez, G. G., Matsumura, L. C., & Valdes, R. (2004). Investigating the process approach to writing instruction in urban middle schools. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47(6), 462–477.

Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2),119–144.

Shavelson, R. J. (2006). On the integration of formative assessment in teaching and learning with implications for teacher education. Paper prepared for the Stanford Education Assessment Laboratory and the University of Hawaii Curriculum Research and Development Group. Retrieved December 27, 2011, from Center. (2010). Metacognitive processes. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved December 27, 2011, from

Authors: TEAL Center staff

Reviewed by: Linda Mason, Penn State University

About the TEAL Center: The Teaching Excellence in Adult Literacy (TEAL) Center is a project of the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Vocational and Adult Education (OVAE), designed to improve the quality of teaching in adult education in the content areas.


Home   |   Contact Us   |   Accessibility   |   Site Map

The Teacher Excellence in Adult Literacy (TEAL) Center was developed by the American Institutes for Research through Contract No. ED-VAE-09-O-0060. It is administered by the Division of Adult Education and Literacy in the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education at the U.S. Department of Education. The site is maintained by Quotient Inc., under Contract No. ED-VAE-11-O-0083